<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>joelgibby.net &#187; Longhorn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joelgibby.net/category/longhorn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joelgibby.net</link>
	<description>I know people from the future. Ask me anything. Tell me what you know.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:07:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>		<item>
		<title>Windows Server Virtualization (Viridian) Announcement (sad)</title>
		<link>http://joelgibby.net/2007/05/10/windows-server-virtualization-viridian-announcement-sad/</link>
		<comments>http://joelgibby.net/2007/05/10/windows-server-virtualization-viridian-announcement-sad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 04:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joelgibby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Longhorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS Virtual Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[System Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Server 2005]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelgibby.net/2007/05/10/windows-server-virtualization-viridian-announcement-sad/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh come on now!Â (Windows Server Division Blog)
They already are releasing the product late (the BETA will be released in conjunction with theÂ RTM of Longhorn), and now they are removing some of the most highly-touted features that actually were going to set the product apart from the leader? Some of the ground-breaking features being axed:

Hot-add of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Features removed from Viridian to ship on time" href="http://blogs.technet.com/windowsserver/archive/2007/05/10/viridian-features-update-beta-planned-for-longhorn-rtm.aspx">Oh come on now!</a>Â (Windows Server Division Blog)</p>
<p>They already are releasing the product late (the BETA will be released in conjunction with theÂ RTM of Longhorn), and now they are removing some of the most highly-touted features that actually were going to set the product apart from the leader? Some of the ground-breaking features being axed:</p>
<ul>
<li>Hot-add of resources (memory, processor, storage and networking)</li>
<li>Live migration (this is a killer app currently being offered by VMWare in their VMotion technology)</li>
<li>Support limit of 16 cores (4 processor, quad core) though I don&#8217;t see this as a big issue. I think you&#8217;d need some pretty hefty hardware for your host to even get close to that many cores being useful. My vision probably isn&#8217;t as broad as the developers though &#8211; I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll see Quad-proc, Octo-Core boxes on the desktop a few years out.</li>
</ul>
<p>Stings, doesn&#8217;t it? Time to start looking at VMWare&#8230;</p>
<p><a title="Sad news about Viridian" href="http://www.windows-now.com/blogs/robert/archive/2007/05/10/microsoft-s-virtualization-strategy-is-doomed-to-fail.aspx">Another dismal take on the news.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joelgibby.net/2007/05/10/windows-server-virtualization-viridian-announcement-sad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
